The Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs at Georgetown University recently hosted a panel discussion on how religious liberty figures into the Arab Spring, featuring an array of experts, including a representative from the Pew Forum, a former Bush Administration counsel, and various professors.
The discussion, introduced by Tom Farr (author of several pieces in this magazine), centers around the thesis that repressive regimes paradoxically increase religious bloodshed in the long term, while more democratic societies (particularly ones which permit the expression of religious sentiment in public life) ultimately have fewer incidents of violence and radicalization. It’s a polarizing claim, and it engendered some lively dissension, particularly on the part of Mohammed Hafez, a scholar at the Naval Academy, who attacks that thesis as overly optimistic, wielding example upon example.
Of Roots and Adventures
I have lived in Ohio, Michigan, Georgia (twice), Pennsylvania, Alabama (also twice), England, and Idaho. I left…
Our Most Popular Articles of 2025
It’s been a big year for First Things. Our website was completely redesigned, and stories like the…
Our Year in Film & Television—2025
First Things editors and writers share the most memorable films and TV shows they watched this year.…