Sprung

. . . from jury duty, but not before witnessing this exchange between the judge and a recent graduate from law school.

Judge: Can you be a fair and impartial juror on this case?

Potential Juror: No.

Judge: Why not?

Potential Juror: Because I’m against crime.

Now I would have followed up with: “What law school did you go to, and did you use a dial-up or broadband connection to access your courses?”

Instead, the judge patiently tried to explain to the law school graduate that we were all against crime, that no one was for crime, and that her objection was irrelevant. She persisted, and so was excused. I swear the court stenographer tried to trip her as she left the jury box . . .

I came this close (my thumb and forefinger are an eighth of an inch apart) to being selected for one particular jury—until I asked about jury nullification and the possibility of the case being referred to the Star Chamber.

I was physically escorted from the courtroom.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Battle of Minneapolis

Pavlos Papadopoulos

The Battle of Minneapolis is the latest flashpoint in our ongoing regime-level political conflict. It pits not…

Of Roots and Adventures

Peter J. Leithart

I have lived in Ohio, Michigan, Georgia (twice), Pennsylvania, Alabama (also twice), England, and Idaho. I left…

Our Most Popular Articles of 2025

The Editors

It’s been a big year for First Things. Our website was completely redesigned, and stories like the…