The word for “bride” ( kallah ) has a strange career in the Old Testament. Up through 1 Chronicles 2:4, it exclusively means “daughter-in-law.” In the six uses in Song of Songs, it is translated as “bride,” and after the Song the prophets use the word almost exclusively to mean “bride” (cf. the exceptions in Ezekiel 22:11 and Micah 7:6).
Does this mark out a progression in Israel’s history with Yahweh? Is the canon as a whole following the sequence of the allegory of Ezekiel 16, where Yahweh first adopts Israel as daughter and then takes her as bride?
And, is the repeated “sister-bride/daughter-in-law” of the Song of Songs a hint of Trinitarian theology – a clue that Yahweh is to Israel Father and Brother, adoptive Parent and Bridegroom?
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
