James Shirley, the MIT stem cell professor who opposes human cloning and ESCR because it destroys nascent human life, a “controversial theory according to this Fox News report,” (but basic biology, says I), is on a hunger strike to protest being denied tenure. He is claiming racism. I doubt it. It is more likely to be his “controversial theory.” The life science elites allow no heterodox views to be expressed openly about the impropriety of human cloning without career consequences.
But this hunger strike makes him look ridiculous, indeed, like something of a nut. He would be much better off wearing the martyr’s shroud and exposing the increasing infringement of true academic freedom that has become part of the atmosphere of our elite universities. Hunger strikes can work—but only if you have a media favorably disposed to promoting your cause. And that sure isn’t the case of someone who opposes all human cloning and believes that ESCR is unethical.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…