Shame and the Reflex of Non-Recognition

In the process of doing some research on George Herbert, I
stumbled across a
passage from Stanley Cavell’s essay on King Lear that I think is
relevant to the themes I’ve been pursuing at here at First Thoughts and at Spiritual Friendship. Discussing the
character of the Earl of Gloucester, Cavell writes that

if the failure to recognize others is a failure to let others
recognize you, a fear of what is revealed to them, an avoidance of their eyes,
then it is exactly shame which is the cause of his withholding of recognition
[of his bastard son Edmund]…. For shame is the specific discomfort produced by
the sense of being looked at, the avoidance of the sight of others is the
reflex it produces. Guilt is different; there is the reflex to avoid discovery.
As long as no one knows what you have done, you are safe; or your
conscience will press you to confess it and accept punishment. Under shame,
what must be covered up is not your deed, but yourself. It is a more primitive
emotion than guilt, as inescapable as the possession of a body, the first
object of shame.

There’s much to ponder here, not least in relation to Lear
itself, but I’m especially interested in the generic insight that the result of
shame is an inability truly to see others, to offer others recognition. As
Cavell puts it later, “recognizing a person depends upon allowing oneself to be
recognized.”

This is one of the main reasons that I encourage gay
Christians, when they ask me for advice, to come out. It’s not just that the
enormous effort it takes to hide your sexuality involves an unhealthy
self-focus, a constant policing of speech and actions, which can be profoundly crippling
to your spiritual life (if my experience is any indication). It’s also
that staying in the closet can cause you to refuse to recognize your gay or
lesbian neighbors, all in an effort to stay hidden yourself.

Eve
Tushnet made this point very well several years ago:

The closet also offers a lot of temptations to sin; I’d say
for many people it just is a near occasion of sin. There’s the
obvious temptation to lie. There’s the temptation to throw other people under
the bus to make yourself look more hetero, or butcher or whatever. There’s the
temptation to deny or speak uncharitably to openly gay friends (or, for that
matter, enemies). There’s the temptation to cut yourself off from other people
so they don’t get too close—to avoid friendship, and avoid help.
Being in the closet makes it harder to act rightly. To the extent that being
out involves humiliation and lost opportunities (although it is also
extraordinarily freeing and opens a lot of doors you may not have realized
existed) I would say that sometimes you have to journey through what Spenser
called “the Gracious Valley of Humiliation.”

That seems exactly right to me, not least because of
Cavell’s point: Shame leads not just to self-loathing but also to rejection of
others. Shame isn’t just an individual problem; it’s a social one. And that’s
partly why, in spite of the costs, I do think it’s best for Christians who
experience same-sex attraction to open up and talk about it if at all possible.