Kenneth Burke wisely remarks that “Every document bequeathed us by history must be treated as a strategy for encompassing a situation,” an “answer or rejoinder to assertions current in the situation in which it arose.” He goes on to compare our entry into history to a late arrival to a parlor conversation – things are already underway, we don’t know all that’s been said before, we listen for awhile and make our contribution, and then have to leave when the debate is still in full swing.
When we forget this, we reify historical statements (let us say, Confessions) into timeless, contextless axioms instead of the “answers and rejoinders” they actually were.
Notes on Anosmia
One morning several years ago, as my wife, Wendy, and I were having breakfast together, I had…
Empire of Unreality
Shiva Naipaul (1945–1985) was the author of three novels and two books of mordant dispatches from places…
The Dreadful Christ of Pär Lagerkvist
It’s dangerous to meet a god,” says the disgraced Pythia in Pär Lagerkvist’s The Sibyl. Her observation…