Polling Data on Embryonic Stem Cell Funding Veto Not Such Bad News for Bush

This poll by Gallup is a bit unfair in its wording, but what else is new? Still, I believe it shows what I have been thinking to be true; that the stem cell issue does not cut deeply.

6. As you may know, earlier this week, President Bush vetoed a bill that would have expanded federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Do you approve or disapprove of his decision to veto this bill? Approve-36, Disapprove-58, no opinion-6.

That isn’t nearly the margin that the media has been suggesting. Moreover, it neglects to mention that the law would have permitted embryos to be destroyed with federal money for the research. I would bet that if such a question were asked, majorities would either oppose the bill or it would be very close.

The next question measures the intensity of the disagreement with Bush.(Interesting they don’t ask a similar question of those who approved of the veto.) But note that the “How upset are you that President Bush vetoed this bill?” question came in at only 44%.

COMBINED RESPONSES (Q.6-7): BASED ON NATIONAL ADULTS: Approve-36%, Disapprove, upset vetoed-44%, Disapprove, not upset vetoed-14, No Opinion-6.

Hardly, an uprising against the President.

Finally, most see Bush vetoing the bill out of conviction, and not political calculation.

8. Would you say President Bush vetoed this bill mostly on the basis of personal moral beliefs (or) mostly in an attempt to gain political advantage? Personal moral beliefs-61, Gain political advantage-32, No opinion-7.

All in all, I don’t think this issue is as cutting against Bush or opponents of ESCR as the MSM and some scientists and politicians hope.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…