Here’s one reason—as if people who’ve read my writings needed any more proof—that I’ll never be literary. In his interesting web article , Gerald Rusello quotes Jacques Barzun as saying, “the historian can only show, not prove; persuade, not convince.” I know other people get a lot out of a sentence like that; that, presumably, is why Russello quoted it. But when I read the sentence, I started wondering under what circumstances I might ever say, “Well, he showed it to me, but he didn’t prove it; I was persuaded, but not convinced.” Unsure when I—or indeed anyone—would ever say something like that, I’m left completely at sea.
Letters
Joshua T. Katz’s (“Pure Episcopalianism,” May 2025) reason for a theologically conservative person joining a theologically liberal…
The Revival of Patristics
On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…
The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics
Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…