This site, and most of what I do, involves human exceptionalism, bioethics, and the like. But I still care about areas about which I formerly focused. And sometimes, I take metaphorical pen in hand.
Pervasive secrecy corrupts the societal purposes of our civil justice system. Today in the San Francisco Chronicle, bouncing off the Herman Cain brouhaha, I criticize the ubiquitous practice of confidential settlements to resolve civil disputes. From my conclusion:
The time has come to draw open the curtains. Confidentiality:
– Allows dangerous products to remain on the market.
– Protects the reputations of those who engage in systemic wrongdoing.
– Makes it easier for the unscrupulous to profit from bogus claims and defenses.
– Inreases the cost of insurance.
– Adds to congestion in the courts.
– Most ironically, secret settlements push the plaintiff and the defense, who should be legal adversaries, into a form of private collusion for which the rest of society pays.
Civil justice secrecy is a very important problem that receives far too little attention. Now, back to our usual fare.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Classroom Heals the Wounds of Generations
“Hope,” wrote the German-American polymath Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy, “is the deity of youth.” Wholly dependent on adults, children…
Still Life, Still Sacred
Renaissance painters would use life-sized wooden dolls called manichini to study how drapery folds on the human…
Letters
I am writing not to address any particular article, but rather to register my concern about the…
