What drove the men who attacked Mumbai? Guy Sorman writes that the massacre “wasn’t some desperate move to make a statement. It was a carefully planned operation, under the command of sophisticated leadership . . . in order to achieve a strategic, indeed worldwide, goal.”
This goal is nothing less than the the construction of an exemplary Islamic state in Pakistan as a prelude to a global caliphate. This strategy, Gorman says, “owes more to classic Leninist thinking than to the Qur’an.” As outlandish as the terrorists’ vision may seem, there are real reasons that they think pursuing it feasible. Recent decades have seen the rise of an extremist and “internationalist” Islam that militates against syncretism and creates unprecedented alienation between many Muslims and their non-Muslim neighbors.
Intriguingly, then, it is the localist syncretism and tolerance that are “traditional” and the internationalist rigorism that is “modern.” File that away in the cabinet full of evidence against whiggish narratives of progress.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
