Since we adopted a new liturgy in Advent, a number of church members have, quite reasonably, raised the question about our identity. What kind of church did we just become?
The very fact that changes in our liturgical practices can have this effect is intriguing. Many in the modern world, including many Christians, believe that symbolic and external changes are just window dressing. Externals and “mere symbols” don?t have any profound or important relation to how we think or how we live. Doctrinal changes are important, but changes in clothing, colors, decorations, gestures ?Ethese are not substantive.
But the fact that liturgical change occasions an identity crisis puts the lie to that. Our ?self-image?Eis profoundly bound up with these ?merely symbolic?Erealities. Symbols are never ?mere symbols.?E
In short, if liturgical change causes consternation, that can become part of a defense of a liturgical sensibility, and part of an argument against anti-liturgical sentiment. For on anti-liturgical grounds, such changes should be complete indifferent.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…
