Since we adopted a new liturgy in Advent, a number of church members have, quite reasonably, raised the question about our identity. What kind of church did we just become?
The very fact that changes in our liturgical practices can have this effect is intriguing. Many in the modern world, including many Christians, believe that symbolic and external changes are just window dressing. Externals and “mere symbols” don?t have any profound or important relation to how we think or how we live. Doctrinal changes are important, but changes in clothing, colors, decorations, gestures ?Ethese are not substantive.
But the fact that liturgical change occasions an identity crisis puts the lie to that. Our ?self-image?Eis profoundly bound up with these ?merely symbolic?Erealities. Symbols are never ?mere symbols.?E
In short, if liturgical change causes consternation, that can become part of a defense of a liturgical sensibility, and part of an argument against anti-liturgical sentiment. For on anti-liturgical grounds, such changes should be complete indifferent.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Restoring Man at Notre Dame
It is fascinating to be an outsider on the inside of an institution going through times of…
Deliver Us from Evil
In a recent New York Times article entitled “Freedom With a Side of Guilt: How Food Delivery…
Natural Law Needs Revelation
Natural law theory teaches that God embedded a teleological moral order in the world, such that things…
