The variety and flexibility of Thomas’s terminology regarding Christ’s passion and sin is remarkable. In ST III, 49, 1, he asks whether Christ’s passion liberates from sin ( liberati a peccato ). Christ’s death brings freedom.
Then he shifts gears. Objection 2 says that “Christ’s Passion could not cleanse ( mundare ) us from sin.” In objection 4, he writes of “forgiveness” ( remissio ). At the end of the Respondeo , he concludes that Christ’s sufferings have divine power to “expel” sins ( expellendum peccatum ).
The terminological disconnect between the objection and response indicates that Thomas viewed these terms as virtually interchangeable. To an objection about “liberation” from sin, Thomas responds that Christ’s passion “expels” sin. To an objection about “cleansing,” Thomas responds with an argument about remissio . Objection 4 speaks of forgiveness, but the reply introduces a new concept, deletionem propriorum peccatorum .
Where Protestant theology generally distinguishes between forgiveness of the guilt of sin and liberation from the power of sin, Thomas smudges: Liberation is forgiveness is cleansing is expulsion is deletion. To be forgiven is, for Thomas, to be freed.
History’s Pro Tips on Iran
Nothing in human experience compares to the wars of the last 120 years. Their scope has grown…
Paul Ehrlich, False Prophet
Paul Ehrlich, noted author of The Population Bomb, died last week. Few people have been so consequentially…
Restoring Man at Notre Dame
It is fascinating to be an outsider on the inside of an institution going through times of…