Is Revolutionary Aristotelianism an Oxymoron?: The Case of MacIntyre

Here’s a very good and sympathetic review of Alasdair’s work that says it is. THE LINK IS NOW REALLY THERE!

Here’s one sentence: “It seems to me that MacIntyre’s image of modernity as an integrated, monolithic condition only makes sense within Marxist assumptions that he has clearly abandoned.”

For Marx, MacIntyre would simply be a reactionary. But revolutionaries and reactionaries have the same radical objections to the capitalist present. And the same obsession with the mode of production.

That leads to the rhetorical questions: MacIntyre seems to uncritically accept Marx’s description of capitalism in THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. But Marx clearly meant those seemingly empirical observations to be polemical exaggerations designed to provoke revolutionary hatred. Their emotional goal is the same: To get us to hate capitalism and to identify our present reality as capitalism and nothing more.

Should MacIntyre’s exaggerations be read the same way, as deliberately unempirical and provocative? Maybe or maybe not, insofar as MacIntrye’s revolutionary method is quite different.

As the reviewer suggests, it’s just not true that the great mass of people have been reduced to nothing.

Thanks to Tom Harmon for calling this review to my FACEBOOK attention.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…