An abridged version of a much longer interview I gave to the Italian paper Avvenire about the Eluana Englaro and Terri Schiavo cases appeared the other day. (Hit this link for the English translation and commentary about the interview by Bruce Chapman, head of the Discovery Institute.) It’s interesting that the dehydration issue remains intensly controversial in Italy and other European countries, far more in many respects than here in the USA.
I think a clarification is in order about one aspect of the interview that I explained further to the reporter, but which for space reasons didn’t make the published interview. When I said it should be harder to withdraw tube-supplied sustenance, I was referring to situations in which decisions are being made by others for the patient. While I disagree with wanting to refuse tube sustenance, I think a patient has the right to so decide for themselves that they don’t want a feeding tube. But due to the consequences and symbolism of withdrawing all foods and fluids, I also think such decision should have to be in writing or the overwhelming benefit of the doubt must go to providing medically appropriate nutritional support.
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…