The controvers over the end of life counseling section of the House health care reform bill has raised fears that such counseling could become persuasion to refuse care—particularly since the point of the agenda is to cut costs. Over at Secondhand Smoke , I illustrate the potential problem by quoting from a model advance health care directive, published by a major bioethics institute, that has boilerplate language both refusing care and authorizing the signer to be a participant in medical experimentation. Patients who want treatment have to scratch out the boilerplate.
If this provision remains in the reform bill, amendments are needed to ensure that any counseling is not outcome directed. I offer a few suggestions here .
A Catholic Approach to Immigration
In the USCCB’s recent Special Pastoral Message, the bishops of the United States highlight the suffering inflicted…
The Classroom Heals the Wounds of Generations
“Hope,” wrote the German-American polymath Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy, “is the deity of youth.” Wholly dependent on adults, children…
Still Life, Still Sacred
Renaissance painters would use life-sized wooden dolls called manichini to study how drapery folds on the human…