In his Teaching Company tapes on Chaucer, Seth Lehrer claims that the medievals lacked a conception of historical change, and that one of the key cultural effects of the Renaissance was to introduce the idea that things change.
This at least needs to be qualified, if not rejected, for two reasons. First, Christianity has a base-line commitment to historical change, as Augustine and many other church fathers recognized. Jesus came not to renew the Law but to bring in a New Law or a new covenant, and that New Law came with its own customs, signs, rites. There is a “translation” inherent in the move from OC to NC, and this did not go unnoticed by patristic and medieval writers.
Second, though it’s true that mutability is a Renaissance obsession, the medievals were also aware of this phenomenon.
Thesis: Christianity actually introduced the notion of historical change into the classical world, and to the extent that Christianity resisted change it was infected by the staticism of classical philosophy. Now, if I can only find a decade or so of free time to construct an argument for that thesis . . . .
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…
