Two days later, the online retailer explains that it was an accident caused by a glitch starting in France and is working to correct the problem. But it was two days too late. Bloggers and authors came out swinging—“Amazon is selling discrimination,” screams one headline. Petitions were started, Twitter feeds created .
The New York Times sums up the outrage: “Most of the company’s online critics complained that the problem appeared to have a disproportionate effect on gay and lesbian themed books, leading to cries of censorship.”
Bingo. The problem “appeared” to be “disproportionate.” The moral of the story? If an action—even an accidental one—can be interpreted as discrimination, it most certainly will be .
The Battle of Minneapolis
The Battle of Minneapolis is the latest flashpoint in our ongoing regime-level political conflict. It pits not…
Of Roots and Adventures
I have lived in Ohio, Michigan, Georgia (twice), Pennsylvania, Alabama (also twice), England, and Idaho. I left…
Our Most Popular Articles of 2025
It’s been a big year for First Things. Our website was completely redesigned, and stories like the…