Deleuze and Guattari chide Lacan for assuming, with most of the Western philosophical tradition, that desire expresses a lack. They suggest instead that desire is productive, that we are “desiring machines.”
Why would everyone think that desire expresses lack? Calvin would say it comes from a confusion of the present state of man with the original state, the assumption that fallen human beings straightforwardly point to the character of human nature as such.
John Paul agrees. Far from being part of the original creation, the lust or concupiscence of which 1 John speaks is a result of the “damage” and “deficiencies” and “limitations” that come with sin: “Concupiscence is to be explained as a lack, as a lack, however, that plunges its roots into the original depth of the human spirit.” Postlapsarian desire, not desire as such, arises from the desperation of loss.
Our Most Popular Articles of 2025
It’s been a big year for First Things. Our website was completely redesigned, and stories like the…
Our Year in Film & Television—2025
First Things editors and writers share the most memorable films and TV shows they watched this year.…
Religious Freedom Is the Soul of American Security
In the quiet sanctuary of West Point’s Old Cadet Chapel, a striking mural crowns the apse above…