In his commentary on the Song of Songs, Jenson makes the startling claim that “the Bible’s God is sheer contingency.” He elaborates: “He is the one who chooses what he chooses because he chooses it; he is the one who is what he is because he is it; and for whom the coincidence of fact and reason is not necessity but freedom. In consequence, his relation to Israel and the church can only be truly described with such alarming concepts as election or predestination – or love.”
Which makes one wonder: How did Calvinism, with its overt affirmations of predestination, ever get mixed up with determinism and necessity?
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Classroom Heals the Wounds of Generations
“Hope,” wrote the German-American polymath Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy, “is the deity of youth.” Wholly dependent on adults, children…
Still Life, Still Sacred
Renaissance painters would use life-sized wooden dolls called manichini to study how drapery folds on the human…
Letters
I am writing not to address any particular article, but rather to register my concern about the…
