In his treatise against Faustus the Manichean, Augustine cites 1 Timothy4 in a discussion of clean and unclean foods. He is trying to demonstrate the harmony of Old and New, and parrying Faustus’ claim that Catholics as much as Manicheans reject the Old Testament. Augustine explains that when Paul said that all things are clean and that every creature is good, he was talking “about their natures.” When earlier texts describe some created things as unclean, they were not talking about nature “but because of what they signified, on account of certain prophetic signs suited to that time.”
I wonder: To what extent is the distinction of nature and signification a product of the coming of the New Covenant order? And I wonder: To what degree was Augustine’s qualifying “suited to the time” a category available to Jews or Gentiles in the old covenant?
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
