Chronicles and Writings

David Noel Freedman suggests in his book on the unity of the Hebrew Bible a reason for the repetition of the decree of Cyrus at the end of 2 Chron and the beginning of Ezra. He points to certain manuscripts in which Chronicles and Ezra-Nehemiah enclose the Writings: Chronicles at the beginning and Ezra-Nehemiah at the end. On this arrangement, the repetition of the decree of Cyrus in Ezra 1 is resumptive, and shows that the writings as a whole are to be understood in the context provided by the Chronicler’s history and the history of the restoration. This arrangement of the Writings makes the most sense, Freedman argues, because the repetition of the decree would make little sense if the two books were sequential.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Letters

Joshua T. Katz’s (“Pure Episcopalianism,” May 2025) reason for a theologically conservative person joining a theologically liberal…

The Revival of Patristics

Stephen O. Presley

On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…

The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics

Itxu Díaz

Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…