Charles Portis v. the Coen Brothers: More True Grit Studies

Here’s a very fine essay criticizing the Coen Brother’s film for omitting so much from the original Charles Portis book and adding so much also. It’s the essay our Robert Cheeks wanted to read back in January, when we pomocons went nuts over the film in several threads, and it brings out the Southern and Democratic Party sympathies of the book very nicely.

But as a thread over at Front Porch Republic is right to insist, the essay’s shortcoming is that it does not take the film’s(very great, IMO) merits on its own terms.

So you’ve got something of the classic literary situation here in which you have different versions of the same story, with Portis having the honor of being the originating Homer.  I’ve read the book since January, and it’s not to be missed. In its novelistic and American way, Portis’ achievement there really  is a bit Homeric.  An unobtrusive little easy-to-read book that singslike few others, and that teaches wisdom.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Undercover in Canada’s Lawless Abortion Industry

Jonathon Van Maren

On November 27, 2023, thirty-six-year-old Alissa Golob walked through the doors of the Cabbagetown Women’s Clinic in…

The Return of Blasphemy Laws?

Carl R. Trueman

Over my many years in the U.S., I have resisted the temptation to buy into the catastrophism…

The Fourth Watch

James F. Keating

The following is an excerpt from the first edition of The Fourth Watch, a newsletter about Catholicism from First…