This is a nice profile of Denise Fuastman, who cured diabetic mice with a combination of substances, including spleen stem cells. As the story notes, she was severely criticized, but look at the nonsense reason the paper gives for those attacks:
In 2001, Faustman said it was possible to cure type 1 diabetes in mice with a two-step treatment that blocked their immune systems from destroying their insulin-making beta cells; new beta cells then grew back, and the mice were no longer diabetic. After her announcement, many in the medical community—including some of her own Harvard colleagues—lashed out at her findings, and accused her of cruelly raising the expectations of those suffering from the disease.
Oh please get real. Remember the unbelievable hype at that time over the CURES! CURES! CURES! coming from embryonic stem cell research crowd without receiving harsh criticism from “the scientists?” Right, I missed those attacks, too.
The reason “the scientists” attacked Faustman had to do with the potential that the cure could involve adult stem cells. As things turned out, the treatment apparently doesn’t require stem cells at all. But the worry about giving “false hope” was never in the minds of her critics. They were worried that she provided true hope with the “wrong” kind of stem cells and that her research would provide political ammunition for those who supported President Bush’s embryonic stem cell funding policy.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…
