I don’t usually agree with Art Caplan, and he doesn’t usually agree with me. But he has it right in this piece that imposing a hysterectomy, mastectomy, and hormonal treatments on a disabled girl to make sure she remained small—while certainly well motivated—went too far. He is also right that people in such circumstances deserve a higher level of services than are currently available.
Still, had Ashley’s parents decided to pull her feeding tube because they thought life as a disabled girl involved too much suffering, would Art still be in opposition to the parental will? Or would it be a case of keeping her small, no, dehydrate her to death, yes? I bring this up because he was often bitter and caustic in his support of Michael Schiavo’s successful bid to have Terri Schiavo dehydrated to death. Here is one of his more measured pieces in that regard.
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…