I don’t usually agree with Art Caplan, and he doesn’t usually agree with me. But he has it right in this piece that imposing a hysterectomy, mastectomy, and hormonal treatments on a disabled girl to make sure she remained small—while certainly well motivated—went too far. He is also right that people in such circumstances deserve a higher level of services than are currently available.
Still, had Ashley’s parents decided to pull her feeding tube because they thought life as a disabled girl involved too much suffering, would Art still be in opposition to the parental will? Or would it be a case of keeping her small, no, dehydrate her to death, yes? I bring this up because he was often bitter and caustic in his support of Michael Schiavo’s successful bid to have Terri Schiavo dehydrated to death. Here is one of his more measured pieces in that regard.
Deliver Us from Evil
In a recent New York Times article entitled “Freedom With a Side of Guilt: How Food Delivery…
Natural Law Needs Revelation
Natural law theory teaches that God embedded a teleological moral order in the world, such that things…
Letters
Glenn C. Loury makes several points with which I can’t possibly disagree (“Tucker and the Right,” January…