Ask anyone who recognizes the name Anselm, and they will tell you that he was the formulator of a theory of the atonement in which God is an exacting accountant of honor. Damaged honor has to be restored; and, tallied up, the damaged honor proves infinite, and so demands infinite restoration. Anselm’s theory looks like that dreaded “classical theism” applied to the atonement. Abelard’s God seems a good big cuddlier, and “subjective” theories of the atonement seem more personable than “objective” theories.
That’s a fairly radical misperception. Abelard’s theory, and all the others that followed him, assume that the atonement was intended to affect us . Anselm’s theory, on the contrary, assumes a God who is being acted upon . On Anselm’s theory, God is at least as “interactive” as Abelard’s, maybe more so.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Visiting an Armenian Archbishop in Prison
On February 3, I stood in a poorly lit meeting room in the National Security Services building…
Christians Are Reclaiming Marriage to Protect Children
Gay marriage did not merely redefine an institution. It created child victims. After ten years, a coalition…
Save the Fox, Kill the Fetus
Question: Why do babies in the womb have fewer rights than vermin? Answer: Because men can buy…
