The boss around here, R.R. Reno, has a very smart article On the Square this morning: ” Does the Tea Party Have a Religion Problem ?” His criticism of Professors Campbell and Putnam, authors of a recent New York Times op-ed on the Tea Party , is spot on. Except for one thing: I’m sorry to say that Campbell and Putnam are not sociologists, as Reno says more than once. They are both political scientists, members of the discipline to which I have belonged for three decades and more. Readers may find little to distinguish between the two academic disciplines, but to folks in academe these differences matter a good deal.
Campbell and Putnam’s observations are as tendentious as our esteemed editor says. I only wish I could say they were sociologists . . .
The Revival of Patristics
On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…
The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics
Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…
The trouble with blogging …
The trouble with blogging, RJN, is narrative structure. Or maybe voice. Or maybe diction. Or maybe syntax.…