Against Rahner

Graced nature, yes.  We are always already encountering God, of course.

But not this: “Insofar as this subjective, nonobjective luminosity of the subject in its transcendence is always oriented toward the holy mystery, the knowledge of God is always present unthematically and without name and not just when we begin to speak of it.”

Not this, and not just because it’s full of opaque Rahnerian diction.  Not this, because: a) Is experience ever “unthematized”? and b) most extra-Christian religious experience is not unthematized but wrongly thematized.  Rahner knows there are idols, but hasn’t he set things up so as to make a smooth transition from Baal to Yahweh?  Better to smash the idols first.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War

R. R. Reno

What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…

How the State Failed Noelia Castillo

Itxu Díaz

On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…

The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves

Algis Valiunas

The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…