A History of Frogs


A.O. Scott reviews
the new Robin Hood movie for New York Times . Not a bad review, really, but then there was this, in passing:

The anti-French animus of “Robin Hood” is amusingly over the top—the French monarch is first glimpsed slurping oysters—but also perhaps a little anachronistic, belonging less to 1200 than to 2003, the height of the Freedom Fries era.

Anachronistic , the English sneer at the French? Because such mockery really dates from 2003?

Get this man to an English history class. Or to a performance of The Merchant of Venice , for that matter:

Nerissa:
How say you by the French lord, Monsieur Le Bon?

Portia:
God made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.
In truth, I know it is a sin to be a mocker: but,
he! why, he hath a horse better than the
Neapolitan’s, a better bad habit of frowning than
the Count Palatine; he is every man in no man; if a
throstle sing, he falls straight a capering: he will
fence with his own shadow: if I should marry him, I
should marry twenty husbands. If he would despise me
I would forgive him, for if he love me to madness, I
shall never requite him.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Moral Certitude and the Iran War

Steven A. Long

The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…

The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books

Mark Bauerlein

The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…

Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War

R. R. Reno

What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…