A History of Frogs


A.O. Scott reviews
the new Robin Hood movie for New York Times . Not a bad review, really, but then there was this, in passing:

The anti-French animus of “Robin Hood” is amusingly over the top—the French monarch is first glimpsed slurping oysters—but also perhaps a little anachronistic, belonging less to 1200 than to 2003, the height of the Freedom Fries era.

Anachronistic , the English sneer at the French? Because such mockery really dates from 2003?

Get this man to an English history class. Or to a performance of The Merchant of Venice , for that matter:

Nerissa:
How say you by the French lord, Monsieur Le Bon?

Portia:
God made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.
In truth, I know it is a sin to be a mocker: but,
he! why, he hath a horse better than the
Neapolitan’s, a better bad habit of frowning than
the Count Palatine; he is every man in no man; if a
throstle sing, he falls straight a capering: he will
fence with his own shadow: if I should marry him, I
should marry twenty husbands. If he would despise me
I would forgive him, for if he love me to madness, I
shall never requite him.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Christians Are Reclaiming Marriage to Protect Children

Katy Faust

Gay marriage did not merely redefine an institution. It created child victims. After ten years, a coalition…

Save the Fox, Kill the Fetus

Carl R. Trueman

Question: Why do babies in the womb have fewer rights than vermin? Answer: Because men can buy…

The Battle of Minneapolis

Pavlos Papadopoulos

The Battle of Minneapolis is the latest flashpoint in our ongoing regime-level political conflict. It pits not…