The notion that the Constitution has to grow with the nation is often seen as an innovation of the twentieth century. Yet, similar arguments were being aired early in the 19th century.
Henry Clay, erstwhile ally of Jefferson and Madison, stated a form of “National Republicanism” that sounded a lot like Hamiltonian Federalism with a populist slant. “A new world has come into being since the Constitution was adopted,” Clay argued during a Congressional debate in the 1820s, “Are the narrow, limited necessities of the ol thirteen states . . . as they existed at the formation of the present Constitution, forever to remain a rule of its interpretation? Are we to forget the wants of our country?”
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Rome and the Church in the United States
Archbishop Michael J. Curley of Baltimore, who confirmed my father, was a pugnacious Irishman with a taste…
Marriage Annulment and False Mercy
Pope Leo XIV recently told participants in a juridical-pastoral formation course of the Roman Rota that the…
Undercover in Canada’s Lawless Abortion Industry
On November 27, 2023, thirty-six-year-old Alissa Golob walked through the doors of the Cabbagetown Women’s Clinic in…
