Supreme Court

Conservative Jurisprudence Without Truth

Bostock struck at the very root of the law in denying the necessary way in which human beings by nature must be constituted. Continue Reading »

20 Jul 2020

The Roberts Court Attempts a Compromise

by Mark Movsesian

This Term, both progressives and the traditionally religious can claim victories in the debate over sexuality, gender, and equality. Continue Reading »

15 Jul 2020

Defending the Freedom of the Church

by Michael P. Moreland

Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru and Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania might have profound implications for religious freedom in the years ahead. Continue Reading »

14 Jul 2020

No “Wall of Separation”

by Vincent Phillip Muñoz

Among the Supreme Court’s current originalists, Justice Thomas is the lead advocate for adopting the actual original meaning of the text. Continue Reading »

9 Jul 2020

Roberts And Roe v. Wade

by John Murdock

Roberts is capable of playing four-dimensional chess, and may be positioning things so that Roe comes down and stays down. Continue Reading »

9 Jul 2020

The Way Forward After June Medical

by O. Carter Snead

June Medical Services v. Russo was a grave disappointment and a missed opportunity. But now is not the moment to dwell on anger. Continue Reading »

4 Jul 2020

A Win For Religious Schools

by Richard W. Garnett

The Espinoza v. Montana ruling is the latest step in a decades-long doctrinal evolution that is as striking as it is welcome. Continue Reading »

3 Jul 2020

The Metaphysics of Bostock

by David S. Crawford

Bostock’s metaphysical assumptions will further undermine the “binary” character of sex, as they have for the larger “gender identity” movement. Continue Reading »

2 Jul 2020