The Biases of a Royal Commission
by George WeigelCardinal George Pell was scapegoated by the Royal Commission for the gross failures of other bishops. Why? Continue Reading »
Cardinal George Pell was scapegoated by the Royal Commission for the gross failures of other bishops. Why? Continue Reading »
The state seems somehow to have turned the jury—often swayed by emotion—into its own weapon. Continue Reading »
Cardinal Pell has been vindicated, but other matters of consequence remain unsettled. Continue Reading »
The High Court’s decision in Pell v. The Queen vindicates not so much Pell, whose guilt was always a dubious proposition, as Australian justice, which was on its way to disgracing itself. Continue Reading »
The highest judicial authority in Australia will review the Cardinal George Pell case in 2020. Continue Reading »
The conviction of Cardinal George Pell is an outrage—the case against him could not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Continue Reading »
There has never been any “evidence” that Cardinal Pell did what he was alleged to have done. Continue Reading »
Our concern for justice should lead us to protest when men like George Cardinal Pell are falsely convicted. Continue Reading »
In three weeks, a panel of senior judges will hear Cardinal George Pell’s appeal. Continue Reading »
Even if Pell’s appeal is successful, the assault on the Church and its leaders will continue. Continue Reading »