Great article by Sabrina Schaeffer in Forbes. The most important lines are:
A central tenet of political behavior research is that public opinion can be massively influenced by elite discourse, especially if elite opinion is all coming from one side . . . huge shift in opinion, across the political spectrum, can occur if the flow of political communications becomes one-sided.
There is more good stuff, but that gets to a big part of our current political dynamics. A large (and disproportionately young) fraction of our population hears political communication that is overwhelmingly one-sided. The vast amount of political communication from the right-leaning populist media is lost on them. That isn’t what they are seeing and hearing (and it isn’t designed to reach them anyway). Better candidates giving better speeches would be . . . better but for many people who would otherwise be persuaded, those better speeches would go unheard and those candidates would be invisible until they could be caricatured.
Thirty-second ads are too short to build a real connection on either a personal or intellectual level. Reaching them with a well crafted message that goes on for several minutes and makes an argument relevant to their lives would be a start, but it would also take an investment, and who will do the investing? There is a shortage of enforceable trust on the center-right when it comes to the effective spending of campaign money.
You have a decision to make: double or nothing.
For this week only, a generous supporter has offered to fully match all new and increased donations to First Things up to $60,000.
In other words, your gift of $50 unlocks $100 for First Things, your gift of $100 unlocks $200, and so on, up to a total of $120,000. But if you don’t give, nothing.
So what will it be, dear reader: double, or nothing?
Make your year-end gift go twice as far for First Things by giving now.
