Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

John D. Carlson talks about just war in today’s On the Square ; a just war, he argues, is not separate from the idea of punishment:

The United States and many other nations have forgotten if not deliberately abandoned the idea of using military force to punish—just as Americans and many Westerners have grown uncomfortable with the concept of punishment altogether. We do well to remember, though, that Aquinas’ articulation of just war rests on the notion of punishment: for a war to be just, “a just cause is required, namely that those who are attacked, should be attacked because they deserve it on some account.” The primary reason for using force is because someone has wrought some wrong to deserve it.

Read the rest here . The alternate argument in this case would seem to come from R.R. Reno’s September column, “Syria: Should We Intervene?”

Dear Reader,

You have a decision to make: double or nothing.

For this week only, a generous supporter has offered to fully match all new and increased donations to First Things up to $60,000.

In other words, your gift of $50 unlocks $100 for First Things, your gift of $100 unlocks $200, and so on, up to a total of $120,000. But if you don’t give, nothing.

So what will it be, dear reader: double, or nothing?

Make your year-end gift go twice as far for First Things by giving now.
GIVE NOW

Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.

Tags

Loading...

Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles