Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

In.san.i.ty—as in “extreme folly or unreasonableness”!  The EPA admitted in a legal brief that its proposed rules to regulate greenhouse gasses beginning in 2016, would require 230,000 new employees to administer, but it wants to forge ahead anyway.  From the EPA’s legal brief, quoted at the Institute for Energy Reasearch Website:

Sources needing operating permits would jump from 14,700 to 6.1 million as a result of application of Title V to greenhouse gases, a 400-fold increase.…Hiring the 230,000 full-time employees necessary to produce the 1.4 billion work hours required to address the actual increase in permitting functions would result in an increase in Title V administration costs of $21 billion per year.

Are they out of their minds?  That’s as many people as live in Baton Rouge, the satellite view of which is embedded above. Can it get anymore ridiculous, bloated, or hysterical than that?  This madness must be stopped.

Update: Just to be clear: The above headline is an example of hyperbole.  Under current law, if CO2 is going to be regulated under the Clean Air Act, the EPA would have to hire 230,000 bureaucrats to fulfill their legal charge.  The agency knows that is impossible—for now.  But that mandate is self generated, that is, the EPA decided to regulate CO2 and other greenhouse gasses once the Supreme Court said it could legally do so. Thus, the agency created its own problem.  If it were to go back to its original clean air mandate—which never contemplated regulating simple carbon dioxide—then, those needed bodies working in buildings full of cubicles would not need to be hired under the law.  But the EPA refuses to back off its regulatory hegemony over the economy, hence, it wants 230,000 new employees.  Eventually.

00 Days
00 Hours
00 Minutes
00 Seconds
Dear Reader,

Time is short, so I’ll be direct: FIRST THINGS needs you. And we need you by December 31 at 11:59 p.m., when the clock will strike zero. Give now at supportfirstthings.com.

First Things does not hesitate to call out what is bad. Today, there is much to call out. Yet our editors, authors, and readers like you share a greater purpose. And we are guided by a deeper, more enduring hope.

Your gift of $50, $100, or even $250 or more will bring this message of hope to many more people in the new year.

Make your gift now at supportfirstthings.com..

First Things needs you. I’m confident you’ll answer the call.

Make My Gift

Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.

Tags

Loading...

Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles