In the latest issue of the journal World Affairs , Andrew J. Bacevich offers an appreciation of Graham Greene and his novel, The Quiet American:
In the twentieth-century English-speaking world, Greene ranks alongside Flannery OConnor, Walker Percy, and Evelyn Waugh among the small number of writers addressing explicitly Catholic themes who might qualify for the accolade great. Yet Greenes relationship with Catholicismwith God, for that matterwas profoundly ambivalent and riddled with contradictions. He cheated on his wife, cheated constantly on his several mistresses, and during his restless travels frequented prostitutes. Fealty and self-denial did not figure in his makeup. He was not a nice human being. Yet Greenes intimate familiarity with sin combined with considerable gifts as a writer to produce works of profound insight.The Quiet American , deriving its energy from Greenes scabrous anti-Americanism, offers one example. The novel stands in relation to Cold War America as Uncle Toms Cabin stands in relation to the antebellum South: it expresses its authors ill-disguised loathing for the subject he depicts. Yet one need not share Greenes animus toward the United States to appreciate his achievement. Indeed, Americans above all should be grateful to Greene since theyshould they choose to do socan benefit most directly from that achievement.
. . . Innocence, he writes, is a kind of insanity. When it comes to the exercise of power, the idealist intent on doing Gods work is likely to wreak as much havoc as the cynic who rejects Gods very existence. Those who credit themselves with acting at the behest of the purest motives are hardly less likely to perpetrate evil than those who dismiss ideals as sheer poppycock.
Only those who recognize the omnipresence of sinrecognizing first of all that they themselves number among the sinfulcan possibly anticipate the moral snares inherent in the exercise of power. Righteousness induces blindness. The acknowledgment of guilt enables the blind to see. To press the point further, the statesman who assumes that we are good while they are evilthink George W. Bush in the wake of 9/11will almost necessarily misinterpret the problem at hand and underestimate the complexity and costs entailed in trying to solve it. In this sense, an awareness of ones own failings and foibles not only contributes to moral clarity but can help guard against strategic folly.
Read the rest . . . (Via: Alan Jacobs )