Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

There’s a close connection between political and aesthetic inclinations. In practice, the development of a political identity is only partly conditioned by views on specific issues: it’s also an expression of what sort of person one wants to be. So it’s not surprising that younger conservatives, especially in and around universities, tend also to be what the English call “young  fogeys”.  Respect for an ordered society and traditional ways of life often goes along with the affectation of old-fashioned dress, speech, and mannerisms.

I like to think that my own days of Waugh/Wodehouse cultism are done. But I couldn’t help feeling a twinge of the young-fogey nerve when I read that the 21 Club is lifting its necktie-requirement , which is apparently the last in New York. I’m not going to argue that it’s a sign of the decline of West or anything. Still, I’ve never been able to understand the devoted resistance of the American male to dressing with some small measure of care and elegance.

One restaurateur quoted in the piece points out that men once wore powdered wigs—a practice we now regard as absurd (although we mightn’t if we were as lousy as your average 18th century chap). And it’s true that there’s nothing essential about a length of silk knotted around one’s neck. The problem is, while Europeans have developed more modern ways of dressing well, Americans seem think an open neck licenses them to turn out like overgrown toddlers. At best, they wear “corporate causal” gear that makes almost everyone over 30 look like an obese caddy.

So I ask, more seriously than I’d like to, whether it’s it really such an imposition. Come on dudes, put on a tie! As it happens, I’ll be in New York this weekend on other business. Who is with me for a tie-in at 21? We can Windsor-knot ourselves to the bar until they bring back the old rule.

Dear Reader,

While I have you, can I ask you something? I’ll be quick.

Twenty-five thousand people subscribe to First Things. Why can’t that be fifty thousand? Three million people read First Things online like you are right now. Why can’t that be four million?

Let’s stop saying “can’t.” Because it can. And your year-end gift of just $50, $100, or even $250 or more will make it possible.

How much would you give to introduce just one new person to First Things? What about ten people, or even a hundred? That’s the power of your charitable support.

Make your year-end gift now using this secure link or the button below.
GIVE NOW

Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.

Tags

Loading...

Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles