This is an interesting radio interview (NPR: Diane Rehm) about the current stem cell controversies. It is worth a listen. The guests are
Rick Weiss, science reporter for “The Washington Post”
Dr. John Gearhart, 
professor of medicine and director of the stem cell program at Johns Hopkins University
Dr. William Hurlbut, physician and consulting professor at the Neuroscience Institute at Stanford University Medical Center; member of the President’s Council on Bioethics
For the most part, the conversation was respectful and informative, albeit it was (typically) two-against-one. But, I resent Gearhart’s claiming that opposing his view—full federal funding of ESCR—will cost lives. One could also say, as some do, that every dime put into ESCR is money that 
is not available for adult stem cell research, where, some believe, the greater potential for clear and more immediate therapeutic benefits can be found, and that therefore, his views will cost lives. But that would be wrong, too.
People in this debate should be free to promote their views without being accused falsely of “costing people lives.” Indulging such scare mongering is to hit below the belt and to disrespect the democratic process.
You have a decision to make: double or nothing.
For this week only, a generous supporter has offered to fully match all new and increased donations to First Things up to $60,000.
In other words, your gift of $50 unlocks $100 for First Things, your gift of $100 unlocks $200, and so on, up to a total of $120,000. But if you don’t give, nothing.
So what will it be, dear reader: double, or nothing?
Make your year-end gift go twice as far for First Things by giving now.
