This is an awful story: A man needs a bone marrow transplant to save his life, and the only suitable donor is his sister. But she won’t do it. Now, he will almost surely die.
The law can’t force anyone to be altruistic, of course. It would be wrong to take her bone marrow by force. But doesn’t she have a social duty? This isn’t like asking for a kidney, which anybody would be justified to refuse. It is bone marrow. Extraction isn’t fun, of course, but it is an extremely low risk procedure and a life is literally at stake. A stranger would have a moral obligation to help, it seems to me. We owe each other that much. So much more, a sister.
It strikes me that unless there was an overriding health issue that compelled the sister to refuse to save her brother’s life, she should be shunned socially. What say y’all?
Time is short, so I’ll be direct: FIRST THINGS needs you. And we need you by December 31 at 11:59 p.m., when the clock will strike zero. Give now at supportfirstthings.com.
First Things does not hesitate to call out what is bad. Today, there is much to call out. Yet our editors, authors, and readers like you share a greater purpose. And we are guided by a deeper, more enduring hope.
Your gift of $50, $100, or even $250 or more will bring this message of hope to many more people in the new year.
Make your gift now at supportfirstthings.com.
First Things needs you. I’m confident you’ll answer the call.
