Okay: Now I am getting a touch of the willies about this situation. Here is the Web site of Ashley’s parents. (HT:Bernhardt Varenius)
Ashley’s breasts buds were removed to prevent future discomfort. Her appendix was removed as a prophylactic against appendicitis. The parents have ignited the discussion as a way of urging other parents of similarly disabled children to consider having them also undergo surgery and hormone therapies to become “pillow angels.”
One of the reasons for the surgery was to prevent boredom. But Ashley could have been given plenty of attention if she were not kept diminutive.
Obviously, all we know about this case is what the parents tell us. And they seem to be on a mission. Fine. But before “Ashley’s Treatment,” as the parents call it—which consists of serious surgeries and hormone therapies—comes to be seen as an appropriate method of “caring” for the profoundly disabled, it would seem to me that we need a lot more information about her case, her family situation, and the potential consequences of such “therapies.” Also, what benefits and burdens might attend to disabled children like Ashley if they are allowed to develop normally?
I would also be interested in what the disability rights folk think about this situation.
Time is short, so I’ll be direct: FIRST THINGS needs you. And we need you by December 31 at 11:59 p.m., when the clock will strike zero. Give now at supportfirstthings.com.
First Things does not hesitate to call out what is bad. Today, there is much to call out. Yet our editors, authors, and readers like you share a greater purpose. And we are guided by a deeper, more enduring hope.
Your gift of $50, $100, or even $250 or more will bring this message of hope to many more people in the new year.
Make your gift now at supportfirstthings.com..
First Things needs you. I’m confident you’ll answer the call.
