It is amazing how similar every story I have read on the Hwang fraud follows the same template, including this AP report. Ditto this New York Times story that ran on the front page below the fold.
1) Report the facts that Hwang is a fraud, but don’t accurately describe the process of cloning;
2) Have scientists assure that the field will go forward, perhaps with even more vigor.
3) Describe the dashed hopes of people with degenerative conditions, but do not breathe a word about the adult stem cell research that offers at least as much, if not more, hope to these people—and sooner.
The AP story has an ironic twist. It quotes Australian stem cell researcher Alan Trounson as wondering how a scientist could lie. But as described in detail in Consumer’s Guide to a Brave New World, he was forced to apologize himself after testifying before a parliamentary committee that embryonic stem cells had helped mice to walk, when the experiment in question hadn’t involved ES cells.
Still no meaningful exploration of the history of hype surrounding cloning and ES cell research, whether the peer review system needs reform, the politicization of science, etc.
Thank goodness we have alternative media.
Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.
