Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

A medical study has concluded that “in-home hospitalization” for the elderly can be both beneficial and cost effective. From the study itself: “Hospital-at-home care was feasible and efficacious in delivering hospital-level care to patients at home. In 2 of 3 sites studied, 69% of patients who were offered hospital-at-home care chose it over acute hospital care; in the third site, 29% of patients chose hospital-at-home care. Although less procedurally oriented than acute hospital care, hospital-at-home care met quality standards at rates similar to those of acute hospital care. On an intention-to-treat basis, patients treated in hospital-at-home had a shorter length of stay (3.2 vs. 4.9 days)and there was some evidence that they also had fewer complications. The mean cost was lower for hospital-at-home care than for acute hospital care ($5081 vs. $7480.

The treatment would involve skilled nursing and a daily visit by a doctor. It would also lesson the risk of secondary hospital infection. This makes a lot of sense. I hope that the powers that be can make it happen.


Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.

Tags

Loading...

Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles