Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

I have subscribed to the New Scientist, which is a “pro science” magazine, by which I mean, in addition to purely science articles, it publishes polemical broadsides arguing on behalf of naked science unfettered by societal restraints. In the October 22 issue, Timothy Ferris, identified as a “popular science writer and professor emeritus at UC Berkeley,” argues in “Keep Up the Search,” on behalf of “free empirical inquiry.” (No link available. You have to be a subscriber.) Those who wish to regulate science, he claims, are “opponents of science,” whether conservative (based allegedly on religion), or those he calls “our fellow liberals,” who worry about potential consequences of experiments gone wrong.

Ferris claims that “government restrictions on scientific research seldom if ever make sense.” He states that the best way to reduce ignorance in the world is “through persistent experimentation on just about every front that anyone” cares “to explore.” That’s a very broad statement that would permit no reasonable parameters. He even goes so far as to claim that science moves forward “pretty much how liberal democracies proceed” and that the future of free countries “are bright, if only because it is there that science has taken root and grown.”

But this is wrong: Liberal democracy isn’t laissez faire anarchy of the kind Ferris seems to advocate for science. Rather, liberal democracies depend on widespread adherence to certain commonly accepted ethical principles and assumptions, that is upon a system of ordered liberty. Or to put it another way, we remain free precisely because we establish reasonable checks and balances over powerful institutions—and what institution is more powerful than science?

Ferris is another example of a believer in scientism transforming science from a means into an ends, a belief system rather than a method. Science as the be all and end all. Rather than supporting liberal democracy, such beliefs are a challenge to it.

00 Days
00 Hours
00 Minutes
00 Seconds
Dear Reader,

Time is short, so I’ll be direct: FIRST THINGS needs you. And we need you by December 31 at 11:59 p.m., when the clock will strike zero. Give now at supportfirstthings.com.

First Things does not hesitate to call out what is bad. Today, there is much to call out. Yet our editors, authors, and readers like you share a greater purpose. And we are guided by a deeper, more enduring hope.

Your gift of $50, $100, or even $250 or more will bring this message of hope to many more people in the new year.

Make your gift now at supportfirstthings.com.

First Things needs you. I’m confident you’ll answer the call.

Make My Gift

Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.

Tags

Loading...

Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles