Bioethics ideology is generally relativist and roughly utilitarian. “Choice” is the keyword for “persons,” e.g., those with sufficient cognitive capacity to possess what the rest of us call human rights. (Persons can be non humans in this thinking.) If one is not a person, however, they may not have the right to life or even, to bodily integrity. Recall my debate with biothicist Bill Allen when he said Michael Schiavo should have been able to consent to Terri’s organs being harvested before she was actually dead.
A few bioethicists are so smitten by autonomy, that they are now promoting the notion that people obsessed with becoming amputees should be able to have healthy limbs cut off and willing physicians should be able to do it. This is not the mainstream view—yet. But given the nearly anything goes tide that sweeps bioethics discourse forward, it may only be a matter of time.
You have a decision to make: double or nothing.
For this week only, a generous supporter has offered to fully match all new and increased donations to First Things up to $60,000.
In other words, your gift of $50 unlocks $100 for First Things, your gift of $100 unlocks $200, and so on, up to a total of $120,000. But if you don’t give, nothing.
So what will it be, dear reader: double, or nothing?
Make your year-end gift go twice as far for First Things by giving now.
