On the Third Day
by Piers Paul Read
Random House, 259 pages, $20
You can’t fault novelist Piers Paul Read for raising some intriguing questions around a fascinating pair of archeological conceits: What would happen if a skeleton bearing the marks of torture and crucifixion associated with Jesus of Nazareth were found beneath Jerusalem’s Temple Mount—shortly after a hitherto unknown codex of Josephus' Jewish War had suggested just such a possibility? How would individuals react? And what about the various theological factions in the Church? Alas, Read gives us caricatured reactions to such hypothetical events, while devoting the bulk of his book to an unremitting attack against Zionism and the current government of Israel. True, it’s not so bad as Edward Said. But one expects more in the way of art, and less in the way of polemics, from the author of such fine entertainments as Alive and The Free Frenchman.
—George Weigel
Between Kant and Kabbalah: An Introduction to Isaac Breuer’s Philosophy of Judaism
by Alan L. Mittleman
SUNY Press, 227 pages, $44.50
A fascinating monograph about a little-known modern Jewish thinker. Isaac Breuer (1883—1946), one of the leaders of the strictest segment of German Orthodox Judaism, emigrated to Palestine in 1936. Although not a rabbi, he was thoroughly educated in the classical Jewish sources, as well as in philosophy and law. Although deeply opposed to secular Zionism, and even to religious Zionism because of what he perceived to be its too-easy acceptance of secularism in Jewish life, Breuer was committed to the rebuilding of the Jewish homeland in the land of Israel, where he hoped a “Torah state,” governed and guided by Jewish law and tradition in the fullest sense, would eventually emerge. Mittleman places Breuer in both Jewish and European history, and shows that even though many of Breuer’s ideas seem “deeply flawed,” he nevertheless is important for those concerned with the moral and spiritual implications of Jewish “sacred nationhood” after 1948 (and 1967).
—David Novak
Interpreting Maimonides: Studies in Methodology, Metaphysics, and Moral Philosophy
by Marvin Fox
University of Chicago Press, 356 pages, $27
As modern Thomists attempt to reappropriate the philosophy of Aquinas, some contemporary Jewish thinkers are attempting the same thing with the philosophy of Moses Maimonides. Prof. Marvin Fox of Brandeis, foremost among them, has over the past twenty-five years published normative essays on Maimonides. His 1972 essay on “Maimonides and Aquinas on Natural Law,” in which he argues against imputing any natural law theory to Maimonides, generated particular debate. In the present collection. Fox offers a coherent picture of his view of Maimonides, arguing against both natural law adherents and Kantians, who, he believes, make Maimonides too much of a rationalist. Fox may be seen as the mirror image of the late Leo Strauss (frequently mentioned in the book), who employed Maimonides in his attempt to separate revelation from reason for the sake of reason. Fox attempts to do the same thing for the sake of revelation. It is an important dispute, about which this book is essential reading.
—D. N.
We the People: Foundations
by Bruce Ackerman
Harvard University Press, 369 pages, $24.95
The author, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, acknowledges that in recent years there have been many criticisms of expansive government and judicial activism, but he boasts that he has not been influenced by them. In fact, it is not evident that he has read them. This brief for what used to be called “participatory democracy” ends with the proposal that we need a new Bill of Rights that would, among other things, “secure each citizen against the vagaries of unemployment, disability, sickness, and old age.” Further, once adopted, Ackerman proposes that his Bill of Rights should be unamendable. “This is not the place to go into details,” he modestly adds on page 319.
