OK, surely this is a man bites dog story. A new study shows that if a close friend gets divorced, then youre more likely to get divorced .
Gee, who would have imagined that were influence by other peoples behavior. Were, er, social animals?
Long ago Aristotle recognized that our moral character is shaped by the company we keep.
But I wonder about the premise of the study. Is this post hoc ergo propter hoc (because x occurred after y, therefore y caused x)? We tend to choose close friends who share out outlook on life. If so, then perhaps learning that an old friend is divorcing doesnt cause you to change your mind about the moral legitimacy of divorce as trigger you to think about an option youve always kept in the back of your mind.
Though maybe Im wrong. The sanctity of marriage and the wrong of divorce functions more along the lines of holiness and taboo than reasoned right and wrong. As a consequence, when we know someone who breaks a taboo, unless were willing to condemn him, we tend to participate, pyschologically, in the breaking of the taboo, thus weaking its hold on our moral imaginations.
In that sense, there is an influence that flows from transgression into a close community, weakening power of norms. Thats the moral purpose of transgressive artto weaking the power of norms.
Well, Im not quite sure, but thats also not surprising. The sudden and widespread emergence of a culture of divorce in the 1970s has many, many different sourcesthe legal change to no-fault divorce, for example. And these sources intertwine in complex ways.
You have a decision to make: double or nothing.
For this week only, a generous supporter has offered to fully match all new and increased donations to First Things up to $60,000.
In other words, your gift of $50 unlocks $100 for First Things, your gift of $100 unlocks $200, and so on, up to a total of $120,000. But if you don’t give, nothing.
So what will it be, dear reader: double, or nothing?
Make your year-end gift go twice as far for First Things by giving now.