Currently I am working on a series of articles on Christian ethics with a focus on moral epistemology from, yes, a Reformed Van Tilian perspective. Would love to hear from you on this work:
When we hear the term ethics, our minds often race to stories we have heard about bank fraud and other financial scheming. Bernie Madoff’s ponzi scheme that stole billions of dollars from unsuspecting investors is one textbook example of unethical business practices. We also think of ethics in terms of doctor-patient confidentiality or client-attorney privilege. In both examples, the patient and client enter into a relationship with the professional having the expectation of privacy regarding their personal information. If this privacy fails protected, a breach in ethics has occurred and the medical or legal professional may be held legally accountable.
There is more to ethics than what goes on in the public realm. There is also a very personal dimension to ethical living and has everything to do with our walk with God. When we speak of the Christian life in terms of obedience to God’s commands and applying the teachings of scripture to our everyday lives, often it doesn’t cross our mind that this is the realm of Christian ethics. Throughout the pages of scripture we discover obligatory appeals to God’s law, not as a means of salvation, but as a matter of sanctification. The Bible teaches us that as Christians we are to
put on the new self, created after the likeness of god in true righteousness and holiness. (Eph 4:24)
Righteousness and holiness are moral categories that describe our guilt or innocence as it pertains to our keeping of God’s commands. These are terms that speak to moral purity with a correspondence to God’s character and the sinless life of Jesus. When scripture calls us to a life without sin, to emulate the holiness of God, we are being called to an ethical life—the good life.
Teaching ethics has for me become more than an academic pursuit. I have discovered with delight and great satisfaction that the discipline plays an extremely important role in the church’s ministry of discipleship and evangelism. This is because moral questions prompt additional questions on authority and obligation. They invite us to think beyond doing the right thing to the question of how we know what the right thing is. What is our source for ethical knowledge? How authoritative is this source? Over whom is it authoritative? These questions exemplify the interplay of apologetics ministry with the task of ethics.
Apologetics is the ministry of the church that focuses on defending the faith in various ministry contexts. It is a ministry not just for pastors and church leaders, but for any believer asked to explain the basis for their belief in Jesus. The term apologetics is found in several New Testament passages; probably the most popularly taught is this one:
…but in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect (1 Peter 3:15)
In this verse, the word defense is a translation of the Greek term apologia which refers to a reasoned statement or argument. But this verse doesn’t just call the Christian to give an answer without other considerations. The answer, or the defense, finds its motivation in a love for Jesus, a love for the lost, and a love for truth—not simply the desire to win an argument. The argument is not for the purpose of being argumentative, but to argue rationally and coherently. As well, “gentleness and respect” aren’t just a passing thought in these words written by Peter. With a deliberate interest that God’s truth be shared in a manner that serves well the reputation of the gospel and the church is how we are to understand this passage.
While it is possible to have all the right arguments and explanations that force a person to admit Christianity makes the most logical sense of any other known worldview, an apologetic must be absent of pride, arrogance, and gloating. God can use anything, but winning arguments at any cost is a risk to winning souls for Christ.
Already, the task of apologetics focuses our attention to ethics. There is a right way and a wrong way to defend the faith. We are immediately called to an approach with an obligation to love the person we are speaking with in such a way there is no mistaking our character, though there are times when some unfortunate perceptions cannot be avoided. We are called to strive for character that unmistakably demonstrates that we take seriously the requirement of God’s law to love our neighbor. Unfortunately, well-intentioned apologists often forget their motivation and the character expectations associated with the task, but this should not cause us to negate that ministry of apologetics.
But when I write that there is an interplay between apologetics and ethics, I am not just referring to the call to godly character anticipated by 1 Peter 3:15 and many other passages in the Bible. We also need to understand that the quest for moral truth often raises other questions every member of Christ’s body should be prepared to answer. For example, when teaching young women about dressing modestly and practicing abstinence, surely there are specific scriptural passages we will point them to, teaching them that these are not just our personal preferences but are moral expectations that God has for each of us.
Our society, however, has bombarded everyone with a buffet of moral choices, each rooted in a particular view of reality. Remember when you were little (or when your kids were little) and why? was always on the tip of your tongue? We have within us something that makes us want to know how things work. We don’t just want to do, but we want to know why we do. When it comes to ethics, the young women being taught modesty and abstinence are often wondering why they should do what the Bible says. How is it that the Bible has any special authority, especially when not everyone agrees that the Bible is all that special? For many people today, the Bible is simply a book used as a source for traditional values, but these beliefs are just the arbitrarily chosen beliefs of this Christian subculture. Are you prepared for these questions?
Even when these questions are not asked, it is important to be able to reinforce the moral teachings of scripture with the answers to these questions. This gives the person being discipled the ability to better communicate the reasons for obeying God’s commands, thus becoming a better disciple herself. Moral claims without the ability to give an answer may give the appearance of blind faith, one that’s viewed as illogical or against reason. But Christianity is far from unreasonable and Christian morality is far more than a set of customs.
Tomorrow: The Bible and Moral Authority

September 26th, 2011 | 5:45 pm | #1
“There is a right way and a wrong way to defend the faith.”
Hear hear. Too often we forget this, and I’m glad you put it in.
I like Van Til’s presuppositional method (I’m a big fan of Bahnsen as well), but I definitely don’t find myself in the Reformed camp. Either way, this is some great stuff and I’m looking forward to the rest!
September 27th, 2011 | 11:19 am | #2
If this is within the scope of your series, it would be helpful to examine and comment upon the historical origins of our cultural moment you aptly describe as a buffet of choices; by this I mean the origins of both individual “items” of the buffet and the “buffet” as a paradigm in itself.
The reason this is helpful is because it shows where ideas came from, and therefore how they might come to an end. At minimum, it tends to open minds closed by familiarity with the “default” cultural norms.
September 27th, 2011 | 11:28 am | #3
“Our society, however, has bombarded everyone with a buffet of moral choices, each rooted in a particular view of reality.”
Bombardment with a buffet of rooted things? I like the complexity of your metaphor.
September 29th, 2011 | 11:57 am | #4
“Righteousness and holiness are moral categories that describe our guilt or innocence as it pertains to our keeping of God’s commands. These are terms that speak to moral purity with a correspondence to God’s character and the sinless life of Jesus. When scripture calls us to a life without sin, to emulate the holiness of God, we are being called to an ethical life—the good life.”
I don’t see these as ethical categories so much as existential or, if we want to get fancy, ontological categories. We only achieve holiness and righteousness by participating in the goodness of God Himself, for He alone is good.
Thus Peter says: “Whereby are given to us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these you might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.”
Consider also Paul in II Corinthians:
“But we all, with unveiled face beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are transformed into the same image from glory to glory, even as from the Lord the Spirit.”
Paul is talking about fundamental changes here, about the transfiguration. The “new man” that we put on is not a change of behavior. It goes way deeper than that.
The simplification of Christianity to a moral code is dangerous, and sells short the transformational message of the Gospel, which gives us the good news of our adoption — our inheritance of the kingdom.
Father Stephen Freeman, an Orthodox priest, writes often on the necessity of “existential” rather than “legalistic” Christianity. He is worth checking out. http://fatherstephen.wordpress.com/
This is the weakness of nominalist Protestantism. Everything is reduced to behavior. What about the deeper realities of our relationship with one another and our communion with God? Through the sacred mysteries, Scripture reading, and prayer, the grace of God infuses our being with grace, redeeming us, changing us to the core.
“I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ lives in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.” Galatians 2:20
“If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.” John 14:23
October 6th, 2011 | 12:39 pm | #5
[...] “Putting On the New Self: An Introducton to Christian Ethics,” Sarah J. Flashing, Evangel [...]
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact