SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • teleologist: Thanks you for the opportunity to express our opinions with the time that we had. Tongues will cease,...
  • Orthodoxdj: As Tolkien said to Lewis as they parted on that fateful night in Oxford, “Goodbye.”
  • Livingston Dell: I didn’t always comment as frequently as I had liked to on these articles, but I always...
  • Nikolai Volk: You know, we had a hell of a run in these comment sections. I’ve had many a great discussion with...
  • David Strunk: Hey Joe, I also appreciated what you guys did here, and always had this blog on my RSS feed to see the...
  • Amy K. Hall: Thanks for starting the blog, Joe. It was an honor to be included.
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Thursday, June 2, 2011, 10:51 AM

    This passage from Marilynne Robinson’s The Death of Adam makes me wonder whether we should have celebrated the 450th anniversary of the Geneva Bible last year in preference to observing the 400th of the King James Version this year:

    “The Geneva Bible, first published in 1560, was a very great influence on political thought in England and America. It was the Bible of Shakespeare and Milton, the Bible one hears referred to sometimes as the ‘breeches’ Bible, because its Adam and Eve, unlike the Adam and Eve of the King James Bible, did not have the presence of mind to fashion their fig leaves into ‘aprons.’ The implication is that it was a crude or naive translation, but in fact it is largely identical with the King James Bible, which was published in 1611. . . . The great difference is that the copious interpretive notes that fill the margins of the Geneva Bible are gone from the King’s Authorized Version. . . . Printing of this Bible in England was forbidden, and it was gradually driven out of circulation in England and America by the King James Version, which basks in the legend that it is a masterpiece created by a committee, and enjoys the reputation of having been the great watershed of English-language literature” (The Death of Adam, p. 197).

    2 Comments

      Chuck
      June 2nd, 2011 | 11:28 am | #1

      When John Adams said, “Do not despise Geneva,” he was probably not talking about the town.

      Tony Esolen
      June 2nd, 2011 | 5:48 pm | #2

      The Geneva Bible is very fine. But then there are nice things to say about most of the translations that preceded KJV, including my beloved Douay.

      What makes Geneva fascinating are those marginal notes, which are often scurrilous in the hearty Reformation and Counterreformation way; signs of those times. My favorite is a reference to “that devilish monk Hildebrand” (that would be the 12th century reformist Pope Saint Gregory VII, a hero of mine). Sort of like what Bob Jones II said at the death of Pope Paul VI, that the “archpriest of Satan” had gone to meet his eternal reward.

      Marilynne Robinson’s essay on Jean Cauvin is really quite wonderful, though; he and the Puritans are blamed for things they never did or said.

    Links

    Blogs

    Find Us

    Contact