<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Love and Knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/04/love-and-knowledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/04/love-and-knowledge/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mark Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/04/love-and-knowledge/#comment-17960</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mark Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 04:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=10842#comment-17960</guid>
		<description>No I meant it. Theology doesn&#039;t make you a Christian, but a God lover would want all the theology he could get. Who doesn&#039;t want to know about the beloved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I meant it. Theology doesn&#8217;t make you a Christian, but a God lover would want all the theology he could get. Who doesn&#8217;t want to know about the beloved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Krycho</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/04/love-and-knowledge/#comment-17884</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Krycho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=10842#comment-17884</guid>
		<description>I think you have a typo (or I&#039;m misunderstanding the point you&#039;re making with the following sentence): &quot;You do not have to read theology to be a Christian, but a Christian would read all the theology he could.&quot;

Did you mean, &quot;You do not have to be a Christian to read theology, but...&quot; or am I mistaking you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have a typo (or I&#8217;m misunderstanding the point you&#8217;re making with the following sentence): &#8220;You do not have to read theology to be a Christian, but a Christian would read all the theology he could.&#8221;</p>
<p>Did you mean, &#8220;You do not have to be a Christian to read theology, but&#8230;&#8221; or am I mistaking you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
